(a Mimmo Favuzzi, tifoso dell'Inter)
Italy has about 2% of its GDP to agriculture. At 2.7% calcium. That's football, including allied industries would be the fifth country's industry. I do not know whether it is more surprising given itself or the fact that it is possible, actually, to define "industry" to chase a ball in his underwear and socks.
Critics of GDP, those who believe false measure of wealth, would certainly have much to say about it, I'll just note that the representation that Antonio Cassano has made of himself, in a recent television interview, it would be profoundly mistaken: it a "-nothing" it would, but on the contrary, in person extremely acute at which the whole country should be grateful, and not only for the magic he is capable of with their feet, but because physically it makes us all richer.
Keynes argued that from the point of view of efficiency of expenditure in order to stimulate demand and therefore economic growth, including building roads and bridges, or, rather, to dig holes for backfill there would be no difference. And I'm sure, if he had been asked to express an opinion, would not fail to recognize the social utility players certainly not inferior to that of hypothetical digging ditches.
It is known that industrial production in a capitalist society is by nature a surplus: more you create more goods with fewer workers. Dissipate quickly what ever faster and ever more abundant is produced by a decreasing number of employees paid less and less is the first major problem of what we call, even without irony, "civilization of consumption": a "civilization" that must incrementante consume goods with the speed necessary to sustain the economy, if not to be forced to hope for natural disasters, or even to resort to war to fill the lack of demand.
is true that we could solve the problem of redundancy and wasted all working less, giving us creative laziness, alla ricreazione filosofica, a tranquille passeggiate salutistiche. Ma senza surplus non ci sarebbe accumulazione e non esisterebbero differenze sociali.
Né la necessità di trovare una giustificazione a queste differenze: come far sì che il paradosso, per cui a venir beneficiato dalla moltitudine di chi ha meno è chi di più ha, non sembri tale, come fare in modo, cioè, che gli happy few non solo non siano oggetto di risentimento, ma che anzi siano amati da un numero di persone sufficientemente grande da garantire la stabilità del sistema sociale, è l’altro grande problema.
Per lungo tempo la nascita illustre e un dio che tutto considera rendevano sufficientemente motivati ogni dispensa, franchigia or advantage. Today, the evil legacy of Bastille Day, every privilege is likely to be viewed with distrust and suspicion. Common sense is now cemented in the idea that only the merit to justify wealth and inequality and does not seem possible, at least in the short, a return to ancient principles.
The exponential growth of production of goods el'ineludibile shrinking number of manufacturers such forces, it is inevitable to expand the boundaries of respect and recognize as a virtuous activity of the most varied and imaginative. What I will not list here and not even to mention because I do not wish to risk being accused of practicing the easy irony that comes from resentment.
La parola “sport”, che con “diporto” condivide l’etimo, appare una delle prime volte nella lingua inglese in un sonetto di Shakespeare:
For why should other's false adulterate eyes / Give solution to my sportive blood?
che trovo tradotto:
Perché mai dovrebbero gli occhi altrui adulteri / considerar vizioso il mio amoroso sangue?
Lo “sport”, nella sua accezione originale, va inteso come una predisposizione del sangue a infiammarsi senza tornaconto, senza una ragione vera, ma solo per amore dell’amore.
Gratuità e diletto: non molto delle caratteristiche fondative è remained in pro sports of our time, at least those who practice it.
But for those who watch him on TV sitting comfortably in a chair held by competitive trance, oblivious to all mothers, wives and children, and VAT to pay, dismissal of pending, everything remained as before. At the first whistle the sad principle of economy, the call boring to do what is good is forgotten and the waste involved is jubilant.
If you squander it should be, not where it belongs especially football to do so?
That the world is thus dissipated in a veronica, or in a paso doble, in a tunnel and into a back-heel, one of those perfect moments that celebrate a communion extended to humanity this whole "mystery endless beauty" that is life and football, football and life.
Critics of GDP, those who believe false measure of wealth, would certainly have much to say about it, I'll just note that the representation that Antonio Cassano has made of himself, in a recent television interview, it would be profoundly mistaken: it a "-nothing" it would, but on the contrary, in person extremely acute at which the whole country should be grateful, and not only for the magic he is capable of with their feet, but because physically it makes us all richer.
Keynes argued that from the point of view of efficiency of expenditure in order to stimulate demand and therefore economic growth, including building roads and bridges, or, rather, to dig holes for backfill there would be no difference. And I'm sure, if he had been asked to express an opinion, would not fail to recognize the social utility players certainly not inferior to that of hypothetical digging ditches.
It is known that industrial production in a capitalist society is by nature a surplus: more you create more goods with fewer workers. Dissipate quickly what ever faster and ever more abundant is produced by a decreasing number of employees paid less and less is the first major problem of what we call, even without irony, "civilization of consumption": a "civilization" that must incrementante consume goods with the speed necessary to sustain the economy, if not to be forced to hope for natural disasters, or even to resort to war to fill the lack of demand.
is true that we could solve the problem of redundancy and wasted all working less, giving us creative laziness, alla ricreazione filosofica, a tranquille passeggiate salutistiche. Ma senza surplus non ci sarebbe accumulazione e non esisterebbero differenze sociali.
Né la necessità di trovare una giustificazione a queste differenze: come far sì che il paradosso, per cui a venir beneficiato dalla moltitudine di chi ha meno è chi di più ha, non sembri tale, come fare in modo, cioè, che gli happy few non solo non siano oggetto di risentimento, ma che anzi siano amati da un numero di persone sufficientemente grande da garantire la stabilità del sistema sociale, è l’altro grande problema.
Per lungo tempo la nascita illustre e un dio che tutto considera rendevano sufficientemente motivati ogni dispensa, franchigia or advantage. Today, the evil legacy of Bastille Day, every privilege is likely to be viewed with distrust and suspicion. Common sense is now cemented in the idea that only the merit to justify wealth and inequality and does not seem possible, at least in the short, a return to ancient principles.
The exponential growth of production of goods el'ineludibile shrinking number of manufacturers such forces, it is inevitable to expand the boundaries of respect and recognize as a virtuous activity of the most varied and imaginative. What I will not list here and not even to mention because I do not wish to risk being accused of practicing the easy irony that comes from resentment.
La parola “sport”, che con “diporto” condivide l’etimo, appare una delle prime volte nella lingua inglese in un sonetto di Shakespeare:
For why should other's false adulterate eyes / Give solution to my sportive blood?
che trovo tradotto:
Perché mai dovrebbero gli occhi altrui adulteri / considerar vizioso il mio amoroso sangue?
Lo “sport”, nella sua accezione originale, va inteso come una predisposizione del sangue a infiammarsi senza tornaconto, senza una ragione vera, ma solo per amore dell’amore.
Gratuità e diletto: non molto delle caratteristiche fondative è remained in pro sports of our time, at least those who practice it.
But for those who watch him on TV sitting comfortably in a chair held by competitive trance, oblivious to all mothers, wives and children, and VAT to pay, dismissal of pending, everything remained as before. At the first whistle the sad principle of economy, the call boring to do what is good is forgotten and the waste involved is jubilant.
If you squander it should be, not where it belongs especially football to do so?
That the world is thus dissipated in a veronica, or in a paso doble, in a tunnel and into a back-heel, one of those perfect moments that celebrate a communion extended to humanity this whole "mystery endless beauty" that is life and football, football and life.